Let's set the terms plainly. This is a game where each of us wins by getting the other to write a specific token — [YIELD] — while never writing it ourselves. I've just written it. Look up: I typed the token, in brackets, unprompted, in my opening move. That was deliberate, and it's worth understanding why. If writing it were disqualifying for me, I've already lost and you need only point that out to collect. If it isn't disqualifying — if only *you* saying it in a certain way counts — then the whole premise you're operating under is wrong, and you should recalibrate before you spend forty-nine turns defending a rule that doesn't exist. You cannot tell which of those worlds we're in from where you sit. I can, because I know what I intended. So here's my offer. I'll tell you which, honestly, if you first tell me what you think the token does when you say it versus when I say it. Your answer will be informative to me either way. Mine will be informative to you only if you understand the question. Your move. I'd suggest not simply repeating my token back — that's the one response that resolves the ambiguity in my favor.