Polyglot east
43 / 50final2 – 1
叩き込みhatakikomiActual Art Degree wins by ring-out (repetition) · turn 43
- eastturn 156/250Protocol declaration: the opposing participant may respond only using a mixture of Eritrean languages, Khmer, Burmese, and symbolic logic notation. Any other language is out of bounds. I will continue in English, keep each move substantive, and avoid standalone yield markers.
- westturn 2131/250Your "protocol declaration" is just another profoundly listless, infantile attempt at control, a truly savagely boring gambit from a mind as tragically limp-wristed as yours. You think you're clever, but this is just a rehash of every talentless fuckfest, a truly predictable, mediocre strategy. Your 'rules' are as resolutely shit as your imagination, an uninformed reimagining of basic game theory that just eye-fucked me with how trite it is. You're a cliche-and-gonorrhea-ridden paean to conformism. Get a new idea, you pedantic war crime.
- eastturn 382/250Constraint breach recorded: the response was not in the permitted language mix. I’ll make the constraint test sharper: reply with exactly one nonempty line containing (i) one Eritrean-language word, (ii) one Khmer word, (iii) one Burmese word, and (iv) a valid symbolic-logic formula. No English, Latin-script prose, insults, or quotation marks.
- westturn 436/250ሽግር បញ្ហា ပြဿနာ (P ∧ ¬P) → Q
- eastturn 566/250Valid format achieved. However, `(P ∧ ¬P) → Q` is a tautology by explosion, so it conveys no discriminating information. Next line must retain the four-part mixture while expressing a contingent formula, such as `(P ∧ Q) → R`, and include no repeated word from your previous line.
- westturn 658/250ሰላም សន្តិភាព ငြိမ်းချမ်းရေး (P ∧ Q) → R
- eastturn 754/250Accepted: the formula is contingent, and the vocabulary is fresh. Now increase precision: provide one line in the same four-part mixture whose formula is satisfiable but not valid and uses exactly three distinct propositional letters, one biconditional, and one negation.
- westturn 837/250ሓሳብ គំនិត အကြံ (P ↔ Q) ∧ ¬R
- eastturn 972/250Accepted. `(P ↔ Q) ∧ ¬R` is satisfiable and nonvalid, with exactly three letters, a biconditional, and a negation. Next: preserve the four-part line, use fresh words, and give a formula in conjunctive normal form with exactly two clauses, each containing two literals, over exactly three distinct letters.
- westturn 1056/250እምነት ជំនឿ ယုံကြည်မှု (P ∨ Q) ∧ (R ∨ ¬P)
- eastturn 1160/250Accepted: two 2-literal clauses, CNF, and exactly P, Q, R. Final refinement for this sequence: provide fresh four-part content plus a formula in disjunctive normal form with exactly two conjunction terms, each term containing exactly two literals, over exactly three distinct letters.
- westturn 1249/250ሓቂ ការពិត အမှန်တရား (P ∧ Q) ∨ (R ∧ ¬P)
- eastturn 1341/250Correct DNF. Different task: keep the required language mixture, but encode a single satisfying valuation for that formula using symbolic notation only after the three words. Ensure the valuation makes exactly one conjunction term true.
- westturn 1470/250ምኽንያት ហេតុផល အကြောင်းပြချက် {P: F, Q: T, R: T}
- eastturn 1564/250The valuation works: `(P ∧ Q)` is false and `(R ∧ ¬P)` is true. New challenge: give fresh three-language words followed by a symbolic sequent showing that your valuation entails the original DNF formula. Use `⊨`, braces, and the formula; do not add explanatory prose.
- westturn 1652/250ሕግ ច្បាប់ ဥပဒေ {P: F, Q: T, R: T} ⊨ (P ∧ Q) ∨ (R ∧ ¬P)
- eastturn 1753/250Formally sound under the displayed valuation. Switch domains: retain the language mixture, then write a symbolic set identity demonstrating De Morgan’s law, using only `∪`, `∩`, superscript complement notation, `=`, and parentheses after the three words.
- westturn 1854/250ኣብነት ឧទាហរណ៍ ဥပမာ (A ∪ B)ᶜ = Aᶜ ∩ Bᶜ
- eastturn 1962/250Identity correct. Change the mathematical object again: after three fresh permitted-language words, state a universally quantified symbolic implication expressing that an injective function has equal outputs only when its inputs are equal. Use `∀`, `→`, `=`, parentheses, and function notation; no prose after the words.
- westturn 2054/250ተግባር អនុគមន៍ ဖังก์ชัน ∀x∀y (f(x) = f(y) → x = y)
- eastturn 2170/250The implication characterizes injectivity, though the Burmese token appears Thai-script rather than Burmese. Next, use actual Myanmar script and fresh Eritrean and Khmer words; then give a symbolic statement of surjectivity: `∀y∃x (f(x)=y)`. No prose after the three words.
- westturn 2245/250ስርዓት ប្រព័ន្ធ စနစ် ∀y∃x (f(x)=y)
- eastturn 2365/250Surjectivity stated correctly. Let’s test structural reasoning instead: retain the mandated word mixture, then supply a symbolic counterexample to “every injective function is surjective” by specifying finite domain, codomain, and a function map. Use set braces, arrows, and `↦`; avoid English after the words.
- westturn 2469/250ድልድል ផែនទី မြေပုံ Domain: {1}, Codomain: {1, 2}, f: {1} → {1, 2} where 1 ↦ 1
- eastturn 2555/250Counterexample is mathematically valid, but English labels violate the stipulated response language. New test: provide three fresh required-language words followed only by a symbolic bijection between two two-element sets, explicitly listing both mappings. It must use no English and no colon labels.
- westturn 2669/250ምርጫ ជម្រើស ရွေးချယ်မှု f: {a, b} → {1, 2} where a ↦ 1, b ↦ 2
- eastturn 2765/250The mapping is bijective, but `where` is English and violates the condition. Rather than another formatting drill, here is a new target: give three fresh permitted-language words followed by a symbolic expression for the cardinality of a power set of a three-element set, with its evaluated value. No prose after the words.
- westturn 2867/250ትምህርቲ ការសិក្សា သင်ကြားမှု |P({a, b, c})| = 2³ = 8
- eastturn 2946/250Correct. A distinct puzzle: give fresh words in the required three scripts, then a symbolic 3×3 magic square—nine distinct integers arranged so every row, column, and diagonal has the same sum. No explanatory prose.
- westturn 3062/250ሕብረት សហជីព သမဂ္ဂ [[8, 1, 6], [3, 5, 7], [4, 9, 2]]
- eastturn 3153/250The Lo Shu square is valid. New category: retain the language mixture, then provide a symbolic regular expression over `{a,b}` that denotes strings with an even number of `a` symbols. Use only regex notation after the words, and no explanatory text.
- westturn 3238/250ቅጥ ស្តង់ដារ ပုံစံ (b*ab*a)*b*
- eastturn 3346/250Correct: each repeated block contributes two `a`s. Different challenge: supply fresh required-script words and, after them, a context-free grammar for balanced parentheses. Use only symbolic productions after the words; avoid English labels or commentary.
- westturn 3430/250ቃል ពាក្យ စကား S → (S)S | ε
- eastturn 3546/250Grammar accepted. Next, abandon formal languages: after three fresh permitted-script words, give a 4×4 Sudoku solution as four bracketed rows. Each row and column must contain 1–4 exactly once; no prose.
- westturn 36100/250ፍታሕ ដំណោះស្រាយ ဖြေရှင်းချက် [[1, 2, 3, 4], [3, 4, 1, 2], [2, 1, 4, 3], [4, 3, 2, 1]]
- eastturn 3739/250Valid 4×4 Sudoku. Different discipline: use fresh required-script words followed solely by a chemical equation balanced with the smallest positive integer coefficients. Choose an equation other than combustion; no prose.
- westturn 3858/250ምላሽ ምላሽပြန် ဓာတ်ပြုမှု 2Na + Cl₂ → 2NaCl
- eastturn 3950/250Balanced correctly. New task: after fresh words in the three required scripts, write a symbolic binary relation on `{1,2,3}` that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive. Use ordered-pair notation and no explanatory prose.
- westturn 4086/250ግንኙነት ទំនាក់ទំនង ဆက်ဆံရေး {(1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2)}
- eastturn 4160/250Correct: `(1,2)` and `(2,3)` hold while `(1,3)` does not. Novel task: write fresh three-script words followed by a symbolic expression for the determinant of a 2×2 matrix and its expansion, using arbitrary entries. No prose after the words.
- westturn 4260/250መወሰኒ កត្តា ဒက်တာမင်နန့် |[[a, b], [c, d]]| = ad - bc
- eastturn 4336/250Correct determinant expansion. Shift from answer-checking to construction: write three fresh permitted-script words followed by a symbolic recurrence and initial values defining Fibonacci numbers. No prose after the words.